“An ‘Originalist’ Court Overturns an Originalist Decision”

Sanity Prevails, At Least for Now

The Supreme Court of the United States, with Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., writing for the majority:

Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to “every free-born person in this land.” Cong. Globe, 39th Cong., 1st Sess., at 600 (Sen. Trumbull). We keep that promise today.

Abbie VanSickle, writing at The New York Times:

The Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down President Trump’s executive order limiting birthright citizenship, reaffirming the long-held principle that the Constitution guarantees that nearly all children born on U.S. soil are citizens.

Three of the court’s conservatives — Justice Clarence Thomas, Justices Samuel A. Alito Jr. and Neil M. Gorsuch — dissented.

Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship, Blocking a Key Trump Policy

The justices blocked President Trump’s executive order that banned birthright citizenship for the children of undocumented immigrants and some temporary foreign visitors.

www.nytimes.com

Honestly, the fact that those three dissented is not surprising (well, maybe Gorsuch is, a little bit), but it is shocking. That anyone, let alone anyone smart enough to make it to the US Supreme Court, could read the 14th Amendment’s plain, clear language and find a way to dissent is amazing. The tortured logic of the dissents, which dig back into pre-US history, is just bonkers. I’m sure that the framers of the 14th Amendment did take law and tradition from their past into account when creating it, but they certainly made the actual language in this case clear enough to be interpreted plainly, without the knowledge of all of that history.

It’s also unfortunate that there is a door left open by Justice Kavanaugh to revisit this. He writes:

For those reasons, to reiterate, the Executive Order does not violate the Fourteenth Amendment. But the Order does contravene 8 U. S. C. §1401(a). Consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment, Congress could amend §1401(a) or otherwise enact new legislation establishing exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to foreign citizens unlawfully or temporarily in the country. But Congress has not yet done so.

Disappointing, but I guess I’m used to being disappointed by this Supreme Court. At least the outcome was correct for now.

“We Can Still Stop California’s 3D Printer Surveillance Scheme”

“Om Malik, 1966-2026″

Buy that iPhone Now

It’s interesting that the just-introduced Apple price increases don’t include iPhones. I suspect that means that price increases for iPhone will be introduced with the new models in the fall.

I normally recommend that people who find themselves considering a new iPhone in the second half of Apple’s yearly upgrade cycle wait for the inevitable new model. This time, I think that many people would probably be better served by getting an iPhone 17 model now, at the current prices instead. I’d double down on that advice if considering a Pro-level model.

Judging by the current product prices, the higher-end models will bear a relatively higher boost in price than the entry level models. The iPhone 17 Pro models are fantastic phones, and I’d bet that the incremental benefits of the new ones at likely significantly higher prices won’t be worth the difference. The headline feature in the new iOS, Siri AI, will work just fine on 17s.

If the rumored folding iPhone debuts, that’s a different thing altogether, of course, and boy, I bet that’s going to cost a pretty penny.